Hello!
Here is my reader’s response to “The Double Edge of Globalization” by Chanda:
Chanda(2007) argues that consumption is a key player in environmental degradation. Increased consumption has been brought about by forces such as consumerism. The effects of consumerism has led to increasing consumption of raw materials attained from the environment.
I agree with Chanda that consumption degrades the environment. To further substantiate on his point, consumers’ and producers’ attitude towards environmental protection affects the feasibility and effectiveness of environmental protection policies. According to Morgan (2013), environmental laws against burning of forest has been implemented in Indonesia but it persists annually. This is attributed to the illegal burning of forests which reflects producers’ prioritising cost-effective production over efforts to save the environment. Reason being, burning is more cost-effective as compared to other environmentally friendly but more expensive ways of clearing land. This is a cheaper way of meeting the increasing demand of consumers today, as producers are able to provide more at a lower cost.
Producers’ profit maximization mentality and consumers’ utilitarian objective will result in utilising cost-effective methods of production. To minimize the use of these methods, a change in attitude is required. Such a change may potentially resolve or slowdown environmental degradation.
To conclude, the onerous of environmental protection lies in producers and consumers commitment and attitudes to resolve environmental degradation.